+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: standat impact attenuator

  1. #1
    does anyone have any idea whether what will be the marks awarding variation if we use use standard impact attenuator rather than a self designed and manufactured impact attenuator???

    Russel

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Starkville, MS
    Posts
    299
    You’ve got to be kidding me. Its been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It’s just common sense.
    --Dash Robinson
    --Mississippi State University

  3. #3
    Originally posted by Dash:
    You’ve got to be kidding me. Its been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It’s just common sense.
    ^Is this English or an intended troll post? I'm leaning toward trolling.

  4. #4
    dude that is the funniest thing ever.

    win.
    "Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement."

  5. #5
    Trolls trollin' trolls.
    SJSU Suspension Team Lead 2010-present
    Manzanita Racecars 2011-present

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Starkville, MS
    Posts
    299
    It was definitely a troll post.

    I got one hell of a laugh just posting it :P
    --Dash Robinson
    --Mississippi State University

  7. #7
    Guys, return to the original thread.....is anyone seriously considering to use the standard attenuator? I mean. has someone found something pretty good (or bad) about it so far.

    The cost being quoted($150) for the impact attenuator seems to be quit reasonable but the matter to worry about it is whether the judging criteria for a standard attenuator will be same as or different from that of a self designed one????.....

    Russel

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Starkville, MS
    Posts
    299
    I have seen no documentation to show that such a device even exists.

  9. #9
    Originally posted by Dash:
    I have seen no documentation to show that such a device even exists.
    Exactly. I know Bill Riley posted about it being in development but that was the last I've heard about it.
    Northwestern Formula Racing

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Starkville, MS
    Posts
    299
    Also, in the other posts, I'm pretty sure Kettering University declared that it wasn't going to happen. Keep in mind that the attenuator testing info is due in approximately 30 days as well.
    --Dash Robinson
    --Mississippi State University

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts