akaluggage
11-30-2011, 04:57 AM
Hey,
Sorry for asking such a simple question, but as we have not dyno'd our engine yet I am working with reported figures for my final year project (driveline).
We are going to use either an R6 or possibly an FZ6 for this years entry, so I have made all my figures to that for now, while we dyno the engine. To find out the torque going through the differential and hubs, I have used 54Nm @ 7500rpm and 70hp @ 11300rpm (both at the engine), which I found to be about average for a 2005 R6. When I input the gear ratios, should I be using the primary ratio (crank-clutch) as well or can I ignore this value and only use the gear and final drive ratio to get the torque at the differential?
I ask as I was looking at the drexler differentials, which can take up to 1200Nm of torque. If I use all 3 of the ratios it exceeds 1200Nm where as if I use only 1 it doesn't. So it either means that they have accounted for tyre limitations or I have my theory wrong.
Can someone point me in the right direction please.
Thanks
Sorry for asking such a simple question, but as we have not dyno'd our engine yet I am working with reported figures for my final year project (driveline).
We are going to use either an R6 or possibly an FZ6 for this years entry, so I have made all my figures to that for now, while we dyno the engine. To find out the torque going through the differential and hubs, I have used 54Nm @ 7500rpm and 70hp @ 11300rpm (both at the engine), which I found to be about average for a 2005 R6. When I input the gear ratios, should I be using the primary ratio (crank-clutch) as well or can I ignore this value and only use the gear and final drive ratio to get the torque at the differential?
I ask as I was looking at the drexler differentials, which can take up to 1200Nm of torque. If I use all 3 of the ratios it exceeds 1200Nm where as if I use only 1 it doesn't. So it either means that they have accounted for tyre limitations or I have my theory wrong.
Can someone point me in the right direction please.
Thanks