Popeye
03-10-2004, 04:03 PM
Do people agree with the train of thought that there is a torsional stiffness of the frame and a torsional stiffness of the entire vehicle/suspension as a whole? It would be my impression that there would be four more significant outcomes of physical testing.
1-validate FEM by simply replicating constraints and loading conditions in reality with those used in a FEM package.
2-determine the torsional stiffness of the frame alone between the bell cranks
3-determine the torsional stiffness of the frame and all suspension components to determine expected "slop" of suspension components (using solid pieces in place of shocks, loaded through uprights with all pushrods, bellcranks and a-arms in place)
4-to improve vehicle simulations in adams with respect ot roll center position and overall vehicle response.
Lastly, why would one want to constrain their vehicle at the main roll hoop as it is not going to replicate accurately the load paths through the chassis as would be seen during vehicle use.
Regards,
Pops
1-validate FEM by simply replicating constraints and loading conditions in reality with those used in a FEM package.
2-determine the torsional stiffness of the frame alone between the bell cranks
3-determine the torsional stiffness of the frame and all suspension components to determine expected "slop" of suspension components (using solid pieces in place of shocks, loaded through uprights with all pushrods, bellcranks and a-arms in place)
4-to improve vehicle simulations in adams with respect ot roll center position and overall vehicle response.
Lastly, why would one want to constrain their vehicle at the main roll hoop as it is not going to replicate accurately the load paths through the chassis as would be seen during vehicle use.
Regards,
Pops