View Full Version : turbocharger
mohammad
02-10-2006, 01:52 PM
Hi,
do we realy need to use turbocharger, with a 600cc engine?
I dont work on engine, but Im just curious about that, isn`t the turbocharger only increase the power of engine? if yes, and it doesnt do anything else, it seems the power of these engines(honda CBR 600) is sufficient for a car with weight about 250kg, and with those speed and acceleration times, that you know.
so, why most of the teams use it?
mohammad
mohammad
02-10-2006, 01:52 PM
Hi,
do we realy need to use turbocharger, with a 600cc engine?
I dont work on engine, but Im just curious about that, isn`t the turbocharger only increase the power of engine? if yes, and it doesnt do anything else, it seems the power of these engines(honda CBR 600) is sufficient for a car with weight about 250kg, and with those speed and acceleration times, that you know.
so, why most of the teams use it?
mohammad
pengulns2001
02-10-2006, 02:31 PM
most of the teams dont use it... but the higher power to weight ratio the better, also flatter tq curve and a wider power band
Jersey Tom
02-10-2006, 05:38 PM
Turbo allows you to choke the restrictor earlier in the RPMs. Doesn't pull any more air through when it is choked.
The torbocharger makes your engine work regular. So if you install it on your engine, may have a linear rpm curve and the flat pick of the tourqe curve. I think it may couse to a better acceleration and higher max velocity. but I offer you not to use it if you are working on the first car...
Mybe we'll talk about it more...
drivetrainUW-Platt
02-11-2006, 10:42 AM
Turbos add a lot of weight, complexity and cost to the car
Homemade WRX
02-11-2006, 06:43 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by drivetrainUW-Platt:
Turbos add a lot of weight, complexity and cost to the car </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
all true...but it works for some...and is really nice on a light weight one or two cylinder to help "compensate"
pengulns2001
02-12-2006, 11:09 AM
i really dont think they add that much complexity, and by the time you get rid of the muffler since you can meet db requirements without one (or a TINY one) you only gain about 5-10 pounds, power to weight ratio goes through the roof and your tq curve gets WAY healthier... i think its pretty simple to implement if you have someone who knows what your doing, and in my opinion tuning is
easier... i might just be used to doing turbo work though
my suggestion, if you have an extra 2-3 weeks throw a turbo on your car, test it.... if it works well refine the system and use it, if your good it probably wont even take you that long
VFR750R
02-12-2006, 11:40 AM
Don't forget about the oiling issue with most turbos. If you care that it will smoke, it may take you more then 2-3 weeks to figure out and possibly more cost depending on your solution.
I argue about the weight. Our turbo weighed 7lbs and our headers and muffler were lighter by a majority of that amount. It does add cost and complexity.
pengulns2001
02-12-2006, 11:44 AM
the oiling issue isnt really that hard to figure out, especially now... just call garret and ask them what to do about it, i wont give away how we fixed ours but its really pretty simple
Kamil S
02-12-2006, 12:40 PM
penguins,
don't mean to sound like an ass but why exactly wouldn't you share your oiling fixup?
pengulns2001
02-12-2006, 01:53 PM
just drill a tiny hole .050" in your feed plate, thats not how i have ours fixed but it will fix your problem
pengulns2001
02-12-2006, 01:54 PM
i wont post my exact system because i dont want everyone at comp showing up with the same idea...
drivetrainUW-Platt
02-12-2006, 03:58 PM
talk to turbowig on oiling...not like its some big secret......
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.