Tudor Miron
01-19-2005, 06:19 PM
Hi All,
I'm new to this forum. First I want to say that this is great forum and great knowledge base!
It really seems that you guys (despite competing in FSAE) are not infected by spy mania that usually surrounds racing not to mention big manufacturers.
I'm sorry if things were asked/answered before.
I'm trying to design chassis. I want to learn analyze it in ANSYS. So this question is for those of you (Rob Davies may be?) who have experience with this prog and those who have learned that FEA black art.
I have some questions (sorry if they sound stupid).
1 )What is sufficient mesh size for such problem? For example in CFD there are so called "best practices for different problems general mesh size, close to wall refinement etc. Not to mention requirements asked by chosen turbulence model y+ etc. So what is general "proper" approach here?
2) How you do if you need to simulate square tubing?
3) Do you import geom. from your CAD (if so what format) or model it in ASYS?
4) Constraining the model what is the proper way so to not overconstrain it and so overpredict stiffness?
5) I'd love to be able to plot than compare graphs - like displacement of predefined points along the chassis length so I could see where it has higher rate so I can pin point weak areas how can I do it?
6) I have a feeling that after general design optimization (adding triangulation here and there, changing tube D. Etc.) I have to setup the model as an assembly to simulate reality a bit closer I mean applying loads to hubs and than find what load is acting at bellcrank pivot, shock/spring attachment point and what actually happens to chassis under this scenario. I saw a screenshot posted by Frank in "SolidEdge or Solid works" thread that's exactly what I'd love to learn how to do! PLEASE HELP!
7) How you go when there's stressed skins in the chassis? Metal or composite panel bonded like many teams do?
I have to say that I want to use FEA more as qualitative tool rather than quantitative. Thought if done right it have to be very close. Hell! it's possible to get within 2-5% with CFD if you know what you're doing and have enough PC power!
Thank you
Ted
I'm new to this forum. First I want to say that this is great forum and great knowledge base!
It really seems that you guys (despite competing in FSAE) are not infected by spy mania that usually surrounds racing not to mention big manufacturers.
I'm sorry if things were asked/answered before.
I'm trying to design chassis. I want to learn analyze it in ANSYS. So this question is for those of you (Rob Davies may be?) who have experience with this prog and those who have learned that FEA black art.
I have some questions (sorry if they sound stupid).
1 )What is sufficient mesh size for such problem? For example in CFD there are so called "best practices for different problems general mesh size, close to wall refinement etc. Not to mention requirements asked by chosen turbulence model y+ etc. So what is general "proper" approach here?
2) How you do if you need to simulate square tubing?
3) Do you import geom. from your CAD (if so what format) or model it in ASYS?
4) Constraining the model what is the proper way so to not overconstrain it and so overpredict stiffness?
5) I'd love to be able to plot than compare graphs - like displacement of predefined points along the chassis length so I could see where it has higher rate so I can pin point weak areas how can I do it?
6) I have a feeling that after general design optimization (adding triangulation here and there, changing tube D. Etc.) I have to setup the model as an assembly to simulate reality a bit closer I mean applying loads to hubs and than find what load is acting at bellcrank pivot, shock/spring attachment point and what actually happens to chassis under this scenario. I saw a screenshot posted by Frank in "SolidEdge or Solid works" thread that's exactly what I'd love to learn how to do! PLEASE HELP!
7) How you go when there's stressed skins in the chassis? Metal or composite panel bonded like many teams do?
I have to say that I want to use FEA more as qualitative tool rather than quantitative. Thought if done right it have to be very close. Hell! it's possible to get within 2-5% with CFD if you know what you're doing and have enough PC power!
Thank you
Ted