View Full Version : impact attenuator testing
VARUN RAJ
03-26-2012, 06:35 AM
hi guys
can u pls tell me hw to check deceleration (both peak and avg) without doing a crash test using accelerometers since our university doesn't hv tat facility and tat would be costly outside.........
As far as I know quasi-static tests aren't accepted anymore, so you'll have to figure something out...
Depends on the competition I guess.
atm92484
03-26-2012, 10:23 AM
1) Attach attenuator to front of old car.
2) Rent a backhoe.
3) Place bucket of backhoe in ground.
4) Get freshmen to drive car into bucket.
5) Profit.
VARUN RAJ
03-26-2012, 11:17 AM
we could determine average deceleration by drop test but for peak deceleration its costing too much if we use accelerometers..
Pete Marsh
03-26-2012, 05:54 PM
You could read rule B3.21.11
John_Burford
03-26-2012, 06:48 PM
Please review 2012 B3.21.10
Quasi-static testing may be performed by teams using their universities facilities/equipment, but teams are advised to exercise due care when performing all tests.
ATM92484: bonus points for combining South park and You Tube.
RobbyObby
03-26-2012, 09:33 PM
Quasi-static testing will give you force-displacement data. You have been given a specified mass in the rules. And this pretty swell guy named Newton came up with a nifty relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. You should be able to figure out the rest.
And Bemo, the North American competitions still allow quasi-static testing, but seeing as how the deadline for IA data was almost a month ago, I assume the OP is competing elsewhere. I can't speak for the other comps, but I believe they've been trying to standardize all rulebooks, so I would assume the other comps allow it as well ( I know for sure FS-UK does).
That's why I used the phrase "As far as I know" http://fsae.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
TMichaels
03-27-2012, 03:12 AM
Bemo is right. FSG for example does not allow quasi-static testing.
In that case it is also not accepted in Austria as the FSG-rules are in charge there. So at least I wasn't completely wrong...
AxelRipper
03-27-2012, 08:16 AM
http://fsaeonline.com/page.asp...a9-97ec-eb1c07fbe3c0 (http://fsaeonline.com/page.aspx?pageid=193613e4-fff1-4ea9-97ec-eb1c07fbe3c0)
VARUN RAJ
03-29-2012, 08:53 AM
thnx a lot guys i think quasi static testing would be goodhttp://fsae.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gifhttp://fsae.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gifhttp://fsae.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
VARUN RAJ
04-07-2012, 11:30 PM
guys what shuld b the load for quasi static testing?????
crdekate
04-16-2013, 06:36 AM
can we test our impact attenuator in 1:3 scale and multiply the results obtained by 3 in quasi static testing?
crdekate
04-19-2013, 03:11 AM
thanx for replying!!!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.