News
-
Results
-
Links
-
Photos
-
Forums
-
Contact Us

    FSAE.com Forums    FSAE.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Static Events    Design Reports
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
I suppose that not too many teams have started on their design reports, which are due in 1 month. However, I'm wondering if any of you could give me a hint regarding the "top, front and right" drawings that are requested from the rules.

How detailed have you made these drawings in the past? Seriously, we have umpteen million drawings for components on the vehicle with dimensions, tolerances, functional details, notes, etc... what are the judges looking for on these drawings?

We were planning on submitting a full vehicle drawing from Pro/Engineer with a few important dimensions on it with some important notes and some detailed views.

What about everyone else?

The reason I ask is because the rules don't really give much structure to the report... has anyone gotten any feedback from judges regarding this issue?

Nigel Lavers
FSAE, U of Alberta
 
Posts: 28 | Location: Edmonton Ab, Canada | Registered: September 16, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Charlie
Posted Hide Post
If you listen to Carrol Smith's design finals talk from last year he talks about the report quite a bit. It is around the net in .mp3 format.

-Charlie Ping
Auburn University FSAE 1999-present
 
Posts: 1194 | Location: Indianapolis, IN | Registered: September 12, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
From that document that SAE sent out from Carroll Smith-

"We ask for three view drawings. We expect to see proper detailed engineering drawings – not a crude sketch or a solid works rendering."

Not sure if that really clarifies anything, but its something to go off of.

Kettering University FSAE
 
Posts: 132 | Location: Mooresville, NC | Registered: October 03, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
As you suggest, a Pro-E scaled model of the car and its parts in three views is the right idea. Dimensions and tolerances should probably be kept at a minimum - if you outlined each and every possible dimension, it'd be a jumble of numbers, and wouldn't make sense as an overview at all. A simple scale (e.g., a one-inch line) would give them the basics on which to go forward.

What Carroll Smith did not want is sketchy diagrams or photographs in lieu of proper engineering drawings. Photographs are still essential of course for consideration in secondary, as noted in the rules.

---
Cornell Racing
http://fsae.mae.cornell.edu
 
Posts: 335 | Location: Toronto, ON | Registered: September 27, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I think they are looking for the more critical dimentions in those drawings. Wheel base, track width, frame width, etc. At least my own common sense tells me that, who knows if they want more than that.

-------------------------
UVIC Formula SAE Team

http://fsae.uvic.ca
 
Posts: 150 | Location: Victoria, BC, Canada | Registered: September 13, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Sure would make sense to stick basic information in the drawings, although a lot of the dimensions of interest will also be featured in the writeup as well of course. Just depends how you'd ilke to pitch it, I suppose - my point was more against throwing every possible dimension available at them. That's just confusing.

---
Cornell Racing
http://fsae.mae.cornell.edu
 
Posts: 335 | Location: Toronto, ON | Registered: September 27, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Where can I find a listing of all the due dates?

2003 Project Manager
ODU Formula SAE
 
Posts: 9 | Location: Chesapeake, Va | Registered: February 01, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
It's in one of the appendices in the 2003 rules. Here's hoping you didn't need to file a safety equivalency form, that's past already. ;-)

---
Cornell Racing
http://fsae.mae.cornell.edu
 
Posts: 335 | Location: Toronto, ON | Registered: September 27, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
no i'm fine on that knew i had some due dates approaching.
thanks
nick

2003 Project Manager
ODU Formula SAE
 
Posts: 9 | Location: Chesapeake, Va | Registered: February 01, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    FSAE.com Forums    FSAE.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Static Events    Design Reports

© FSAE.com 2001-2008