News
-
Results
-
Links
-
Photos
-
Forums
-
Contact Us

    FSAE.com Forums    FSAE.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Open FSAE Discussion    Yet another carbon monocoque thread
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
you will want something more powerful than SW to do the fea

There are lots of different ways to do it. The hard part will be predicting core shear


If every thing is under control you are going to slow.

~Mario
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: February 19, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
could you elaborate on "if every thing is under control you are going to slow." ? I don't quite understand that one. Also, we recently obtained licensing for use of Altair's hyperworks software, do you have any advice as to how we should use this software? any teams out there using altair to design their monocoques?
 
Posts: 50 | Registered: February 24, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
could you elaborate on "if every thing is under control you are going to slow." ?


That's a quote of Mario Andretti. In other words, if you're completely in control then you are not pushing hard enough...
 
Posts: 17 | Location: Oxford, OH | Registered: October 04, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
ok....So thanks to Rellis, we now know that solidwork's FEA is not powerful enough to analyze laminate structures, so we contacted Altair Engineering in Korea, and obtained a copy of their hyperworks program. Of course there are no classes and no books on the damn program so we turn to forum members once again to ask advice. To my understanding we can model and test the carbon monocoque structure all on Altair hyperworks. Is this correct? Or do we use shells from a CAD modeler like SW and import it into Altair's software to analyze it? Does anyone have experience using Altair's Hyperworks to analyze composite structures? Thanks so much once again.


fsae.kaist.ac.kr
Aaron Park
KAIST
 
Posts: 50 | Registered: February 24, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Hi,
Hyperworks can be quite frustrating at times and I can understand any frustration you are experiencing, but in my experience it is well worth it.
You could try using 2D elements, so a shell sounds about right (my uni uses pro/e so excuse my solidworks ignorance).
In the 2D panel on hyperworks you will find your greatest friend for composite structures in the Hyperlaminate module. It is fairly intuitive so I will leave it to you to learn about it.
Also, there are some pretty good tutorials that are included with Hyperworks and I would strongly advise going through these.


Hamish Shaw
2007-2008 Chassis Team Leader
University of Auckland
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Auckland | Registered: November 25, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
thanks a bunch
 
Posts: 50 | Registered: February 24, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
by the way how did you guys get your 2009 car ready so quickly????
 
Posts: 50 | Registered: February 24, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Aaron, the car we have recently finished (well, not quite finished, but getting there) is our 2008 car. Because we build for the Australasian competition in November/December our build cycle basically follows a calendar year, so we started our design mid-January, so we had just under 9 months from beginning design work to having a running car. However, we built the car to be compliant with the 2009 chassis rules (or those that were proposed around this time last year) so that following the Australasian competition, we can take it further abroad, (Germany or UK being likely candidates) if the car is competitive (ie scoring over 800 points) and if finances allow.


Malcolm Graham
Chief Engineer
University of Auckland
www.fsae.co.nz
 
Posts: 92 | Location: Auckland, NZ | Registered: May 12, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I would do some test layups to compare to your FEA results.


If every thing is under control you are going to slow.

~Mario
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: February 19, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
greetings!!!

our team is registered for west w00t....number 27, looking forward to meeting all you in person. Just got a question though, for the monocoque, with the outside skin laid down, core placed in, and inside skin being laid down, how do you make the two skins meet/bond???? I've been building it my head for several weeks now and I just cant figure out how it is done...anyone got a quick tip on how to do this?? Once again, how to make the outside skin of the monocoque meet the inside skin with the honeycomb in the middle. Thanks a bunch
 
Posts: 50 | Registered: February 24, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
you dont put your honeycomb all of the way to the edge you need some overlap for you plies to meet back up.

If you are asking questions like this you may want to reconsider a composite tub. Might I suggest a seat first


If every thing is under control you are going to slow.

~Mario
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: February 19, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
PS great number

that was my racing number of choice if I couldn't get that one I was 127


If every thing is under control you are going to slow.

~Mario
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: February 19, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
thanks rellis, i am learning more and more how hard composite tubs are to make, and to be honest am reconsidering. Only if I could see a tub just once I would be happy. And it would answer a lot of questions, but i guess i have to try before giving up. Can any of you suggest reading or learning material on this subject? I cant seem to find anything specific to composites in automotive applications
 
Posts: 50 | Registered: February 24, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
What's wrong with bringing the outside skin over the core and then overlapping that skin with the inside skin?

We call these "close out". You have built a moulds to incorporate these have you not? If not, nothing a little bog can't conceal.

H_HH
H|#|
H|#||
H|#|`
H|#|

Where:
H - Mold
# - Core
| - Outter Skin
| - Inner Skin

Regards
Fred
 
Posts: 16 | Location: Perth, WA | Registered: March 29, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fred G:
What's wrong with bringing the outside skin over the core and then overlapping that skin with the inside skin?

We call these "close out". You have built a moulds to incorporate these have you not? If not, nothing a little bog can't conceal.

H_HH
H|#|
H|#||
H|#|`
H|#|

Where:
H - Mold
# - Core
| - Outter Skin
| - Inner Skin

Regards
Fred
Easier to get voids and wrinkles more complex molds and no core taper requires extremely precise core placement

Im not saying it cant be done but that would be my reason for not doing it


If every thing is under control you are going to slow.

~Mario
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: February 19, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Rob Klyver
Posted Hide Post
"I strongly discourage you from doing carbon tub for your first year. I just cant see how you can modify or fix the carbon tub in case something happens at, during or before the competition, at least in a quick way."

Repairs are easy enough but you should really consider small panel test construction first.


President,
Motorsports Composites Training, Inc.
Infineon Raceway
29235 Arnold Drive Unit G18
Sonoma, Ca. 95476
 
Posts: 18 | Location: Sonoma ,California | Registered: March 14, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
rob, you should elaborate more on your comment. Im interested to know and learn how to make quick and easy repairs just as i would with welding steel tubes.

Remember, some ppl out there rather buy gallons of bondo but wont spend a dime on the bondo spreader.


RiNaZ
 
Posts: 474 | Location: daytona beach, FL | Registered: July 09, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of Zhefei Li
Posted Hide Post
RiNaZ,

There are loads of books on composite repair. Granted, I haven't had enough experience or read enough of them to say that it's quick and easy, but I have my hands on Advanced Composites, by Cindy Foreman, and it overviews way to repairing composites, mostly geared towards boats and small aircraft.

Welding repairs would require at least a welder, and composite repairs would require a vacuum pump. Both require skill and experience. I guess the cure time eliminates the possibility of a "quick" repair, though, if you're already at comp and something fails.
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Evanston, IL | Registered: August 27, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Zhefei, yes, i know composite repair. My comment was for rob to share his experience based on his comment that repairs are easy enough.

My experience is telling me that no matter how good you are in composite, you're still at the mercy of the material and i just couldnt see how fixing composite can be faster than welding tubes.

And the context of this is in the FSAE world, not in some garage where you have all the equipment that you need to make repairs.


RiNaZ
 
Posts: 474 | Location: daytona beach, FL | Registered: July 09, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

    FSAE.com Forums    FSAE.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Open FSAE Discussion    Yet another carbon monocoque thread

© FSAE.com 2001-2008